Machines have taken over domestic jobs that used to be done by hand. What are advantages and disadvantages of this
Cutting edge developments in the machinery has obviously customised live of people and the household chores are also part of it. This essay would deliver into the ease as well as the harm caused due to these equipments.
These equipments, requiring little skill and training has made the life much easier. Earlier house wives used to submit their lives sweeping, washing and cooking. Nowadays they are able to contribute themselves in other ways as well, such as working in various sectors. This has become possible due to introduction of the machines which are vacuum cleaners, dish washers and fridge. All these technogical things has assisted human by making jobs ten times faster and accurate,by only providing it certain amount of electricity and proper service. Hence, the existence of such equipments must be appreciated.
However, using these machinery, people tend to forget traditional ways of performing the tasks. This could be proven hasty if these equipments breaks down. It is often seen that if there is any damage occurred to them the whole day of the owner gets spoilt. Moreover, one must have lot of space as these hefty objects occupy large area. Apart from that the person who is not used to technology, for them using these products could be cumbersome at the beginning. Thus, apt care and skill fullness is required to handle them.
To encapsulate, similar to any other, the advancement in the high end machines has both pros and cons. Although, they have made life fast and easy yet it could be a hassle if not used properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , by
...aking jobs ten times faster and accurate,by only providing it certain amount of ele...
^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this machinery' or 'these machineries'?
Suggestion: this machinery; these machineries
... must be appreciated. However, using these machinery, people tend to forget traditional ways...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, apart from, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97318007663 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5727848101 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659003831418 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8810313 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.125 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15321139508 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445704707135 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398478634007 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872421078141 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367247574799 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.