In many countries people are having health problems because they choose to live a unhealthy life.
What are the reasons for this?
What can be done to solve this problem?
It has been observed of late the fitness levels of people are deteriorating and several people across the globe are dealing with various health issues due to selecting to leading an unhealthy life. The trend of choosing to live in an unhealthy way which is mainly due to laziness and even reckless eating habits whenever hungry. However, there is a range of measures that could be implemented to resolve this issue.
One of the prime reasons of a person choosing to live an unfit life is because of high levels of languor. Under the pretext of time constraints, hectic work life schedule, many people may abstain from exercising. In contrast, we can see far busier people like Actors and Doctors of late, who have taxing jobs and erratic work timings, but still they squeeze enough time to complete their fitness rituals on a daily basis, hence you will find them beaming with enthusiasm. The second reason is brought about by choosing of convenience food, whenever hungry, people generally reach out for junk food like chips, fries, pizzas, burger etc. which are full of calories as well as low on nutrition. Although the market is full of healthier options like fruits, Nuts, protein bars, roasted snacks. Still there are people who may end up over-indulging in such foods and in the hindsight they start feeling lethargic and deal with multiple health issues. Hence, the people themselves can be held responsible for prioritizing indolence and cravings rather than, their health.
There are several ways to deal with such health affecting issues due to pickiness of individuals. First and foremost, the people could start on a lower level to make themselves more active for example, even working people can resort to climbing up the stair cases rather than using the elevators. Furthermore, they can even start using stand up computer desks which will make them stand for longer hours and in between they can even take a brief walk to cut off their levels of exhaustion. So in this particular way they could start their fitness journey. Secondly, for people who cannot starve for longer periods can start eating every two hours in small portions to never end up so hungry to relish an entire pizza. For illustration, it has been scientifically proven that people who eat every two hours, are never so hungry to gorge on unhealthy food. Which is why they can afford to keep a watch over what they eat.
In short, there are two reason namely human lethargy and even careless eating habits contributing to ill-health. Nonetheless, they can be tackled with getting more active and even through regular meals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unhealthy way" with adverb for "unhealthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...thy life. The trend of choosing to live in an unhealthy way which is mainly due to laziness and eve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 792, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ts, Nuts, protein bars, roasted snacks. Still there are people who may end up over-in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, for example, in contrast, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 441.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9387755102 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48130799417 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8197597447 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280387470746 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805680364282 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403527012837 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159529764235 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374209625006 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.