Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since Computer technology is now replacing their functions. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Rapid evolution of information technology has replaced paper-based transactions like books. The substantial influence of modern computer technologies have great impact on paper-based books since every person own their own mobile phones. it can be agreed that utilization of expenses for maintanence of public libraries is an utter waste because we are far ahead in terms of technology.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why we needn't spend money on public libraries, but the most alarming one is deforestation. Not only we destroy plats for construction, but also we depend on trees for making paper. More importantly, by reducing the use of paper will lead to sustainable nature utilization. For example, we only use trees for our purposes, but we don't plant them. For maintaining public libraries we need paper, which in turn results in the destruction of trees. Hence, it is essential that we should depend on soft copy books rather than hard copy ones in the public libraries.
Another key justification to upholding the notion is that we can access soft copy book from anywhere once downloaded from the repository. we don't have to wait in a long queues in public libraries in order to obtain your favorite book. The accessibility of the books are also enormously increased by improvement in computer technologies. As an illustration, Amazon company started by selling hard copy books. only after changing the way of selling books, ie from hard copy to soft copy books their business developed. Therefore, computer development plays a pivotal role in maintaining soft copy books instead of depending on the libraries.
In the view of the arguments outlined here, it can be agreed that modern problems require modern solutions. it's better to focus on future with soft copy books instead on depending on public libraries which will ultimately leads to more environmental problems.
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since Computer technology is now replacing their functions. What extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- You recently moved to a new address You want to tell a friend who lives in another city about your new home Write a letter to your friend In your letter Explain why you moved Describe your new home Invite your friend to visit you 87
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ery person own their own mobile phones. it can be agreed that utilization of expen...
^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: needn't
...tset, there are numerous reasons why we neednt spend money on public libraries, but th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...only use trees for our purposes, but we dont plant them. For maintaining public libr...
^^^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...re once downloaded from the repository. we dont have to wait in a long queues in p...
^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...once downloaded from the repository. we dont have to wait in a long queues in public...
^^^^
Line 9, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
...any started by selling hard copy books. only after changing the way of selling books...
^^^^
Line 13, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...dern problems require modern solutions. its better to focus on future with soft cop...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23202614379 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95821679496 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571895424837 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6191755798 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.1764705882 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144777517866 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494218314016 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042211635023 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972207865967 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572468811037 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.