Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since Computer technology is now replacing their functions. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Preserving state libraries is considered to be a financial profligacy, as information technology is supplanting them. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this opinion due to the provision of unique ambience and authentic reading material at these book repositories, which the computer technology cannot provide to the users.
Firstly, readers get a conducive environment for reading at government libraries. In other words, for imbibing knowledge by reading books, magazines and newspapers more effectively, tranquillity, comfortable sitting arrangement and proper lighting are imperative. Since visitors are provided with all these facilities, these places are perfect for reading purposes. Moreover, people get the motivation to read more when they observe others while visiting these facilities. For instance, reading became my hobby after I initiated visiting the local library in my locality.
Secondly, the state libraries are more reliable compared to the online information because the material available with them is sourced from bona fide publishers, Which assures genuine information to the seekers. However, on the internet, people are often misguided and misinformed because everybody can post articles on the web without verification; for instance, a survey conducted by the University of Texas reveals that 60% of health-related studies available on the online media are fake.
Finally, the public libraries are the best places for older people to read or socialize. To illustrate most of them are not well acquainted with the Computer technology owing to which having these places is indispensable so that they can assess the different type of information Without any inconvenience. apart from this, they relieve their loneliness by visiting libraries because they get an opportunity to meet others, resulting in less stress and apprehension among them.
to conclude, since public libraries are a dependable source of information, suitable for senior citizens And provide the hospitable conditions for reading, spending money to maintain them is salutary.
- When designing a building the intended use of the building should be taken into account rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Nowadays many people spend their free time in shopping centers. This is believed to have a negative impact have a negative impact on youth and Society. What is your opinion? 73
- Nowadays, many children eat food that is not good for health. Why is this happening? what should be done for this? 89
- Some people use Technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing a doctor. what are the reasons behind this phenomenon? is this a positive or negative development according to you? 78
- Some people think that in the 21st century people are enjoying a better quality of life compared to previous centuries.what is your opinion? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...annot provide to the users. Firstly, readers get a conducive environment for ...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... perfect for reading purposes. Moreover, people get the motivation to read more w...
^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Apart
... information Without any inconvenience. apart from this, they relieve their lonelines...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...stress and apprehension among them. to conclude, since public libraries are a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, apart from, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77922077922 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07117458657 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7651410503 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.923076923 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116845309993 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436059842373 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407859007611 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764982570047 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492282548568 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.