In many cities many people are living in high rise apartment blocks Does this accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages

Essay topics:

In many cities, many people are living in high rise apartment blocks. Does this accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

An Increasing number of people are choosing to live in sky high towers specifically in urban areas. Such type of accommodations are generally cheaper while compared with row houses but also very compact and clumsy. In my opinion, People are far better off staying in bungalow or row house instead of flats.
One obvious advantage of staying in sky rise building blocks is that it offers people affordable accommodation in urban areas. With the increase in urban population, land is becoming increasingly expensive and, as a result, many people are unable to afford their own house. Large apartment block require a small area of land but can provide multiple flats which enable people on low incomes to continue living near city centre and their jobs. Therefore, staying in towers help people afford their own house easily.
However, high rise buildings usually offer small cumbersome flats with no outdoor space. For families, this can be a problem as each individual member of the family has little personal space which eventually leads to stress and unnecessary tension in relationships. According to recent survey, families who have personal space are tends to be much happier. Another issue with such residence is that people have no access to outdoor open space, due to which they are unable to do exercise. According to doctors, physical activity such as yoga or light exercise is essential for every individual. Hence, bungalow style homes provide better quality of living.
Changing lifestyle influenced people to choose flats over homes. Flats are often first choice for people want to immigrate to urban cities due to cost effectiveness but they usually don’t provide luxurious lifestyle. In conclusion, I would say although high rise apartments are cost effective, they don’t provide quality lifestyle.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-05-07 pushpak 84 view
2019-08-08 ishpinder45 93 view
2018-11-23 Anujain 73 view
2018-04-11 pbehin 73 view
2018-02-21 epouei 78 view
Essays by user pushpak :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.264604811 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65459413434 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4128768595 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23366974516 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653600495111 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499768188617 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12468808574 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560419301704 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.