In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a debate regarding the fact that in many companies around the world, people who have senior positions have the right of having best wages and receive more benefits than people who have just assumed a new position. I believe that salaries and all pertinent advantages offered by a company should be given according to the person’s abilities and competence and not because of his time of contribution to the organization.
On the other hand, I understand why people think that this statement is justified. There have been many instances in time where people were scared of the market out of the current company, so they stayed for many years watching their careers turning into a meaningless fade. Once the person had all those years working at the same position, it was necessary to elevate their wages even if their skills are not as effective as the ones of the new employees.
In addition, professionals who have been working at a company for a long period, have developed more confidence to perform a wild range of activities. Hence, they get more knowledge of the work that needs to be done and develop a closer relationship with their leaders, which makes them able to reach better positions with higher salaries.
Nowadays people have more confidence to persuade new careers, same as the companies that are becoming more open to bring new professionals to develop new projects and be more competitive in the market. An example of this is the graduate programs available in many multinational companies seeking to hire new professionals who have just finished university, but think outside the box, able to transform an organization.
In conclusion, I believe that all the benefits regarding wages and conditions in a company should be given according to the professional performance and not because they have a senior position.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, regarding, so, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03896103896 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87170873891 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.5474398666 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.2 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194325241926 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813873173469 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469305767603 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105747484918 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491375369933 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.