Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the sorld. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high – for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
The effect of tobacco and many other legal drugs, which was always debatable, has now become controversial. The substantial influence of the consumption of cigarettes has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on adults who smoke in recent years. It can be agreed that the authorities are the main responsible for its legislation, therefore, they should protect the citizens from this unhealthy habit. This essay will elaborate on how the government play a crucial role in this matter.
At the outset, there are many reasons why the political leaders should be responsible for eliminating the tobacco from the market shelves, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that lung cancer is highly found on smokers. The authorities need to make laws more strict and increase the tax of the commercialization of these drugs in modern society. Small actions like those would prevent consumers from making use of it and enhance the health condition of its population.
Another key justification for this upholding notion is that banning tobacco from legal selling can increase the health of the community that also become more effective once stop smoking. For example, people who stop working to smoke a cigarette many times a day can be more productive, likewise, decrease the work absence due to illnesses related to breathing issues.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the government is the most influent character on the scenario of legalizing tobacco, therefore, the way it makes laws and approves it selling should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, look, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18532818533 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8372835852 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.218640387 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.3 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185473844304 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674706477391 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390192037475 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107690180608 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256316574491 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.