In many countries, there is shortage of mathematics and science teachers in high school.
What do you think has caused this problem and what can be done about it?
With reference to the interview of a college principal published in Dawn newspaper last Sunday, the main problem he complained about was lack of mathematics and technology teachers in the institutions. This problem is being faced by many countries. Before offering a solution, it is important to first investigate the root causes.
The major reason of scarcity of technical subjects’ teachers is, a small percentage of students opt these subjects for higher education as these subjects are difficult to study. Since there are less graduates of these courses, that is why there are less number of teachers for these subjects. In my country, Pakistan, many universities now no longer offer these high-tech subjects because very less number of students enrol in these studies due to high difficulty level.
In continuation to the first reason of difficult subjects, the technological professionals do not receive handsome amount of salaries in the teaching profession. Consequently, these teachers leave the educating institutes and join other industries with increased perks. I personally know one of my physics professor who left the high school teaching and started serving in a research lab due to monetary benefits.
In order to fill the vacuum of less professors from science and mathematics fields, some serious steps need to be taken. First, stipends should be awarded to science and maths students in order to encourage them to study these subjects. As a result, more students will study these subjects and the market gap will be filled. Second, the teachers of science and mathematics, should be rewarded with higher salaries as these courses and these subjects are difficult to teach. The recent step taken by the German Prime Minister, for increasing the salaries of the teachers associated with technical subjects, is remarkable.
To conclude although there is a shortage of technical courses teachers, but it can be minimized by the aforesaid solutions. If these steps are taken, it will not only benefit the students but also the teaching profession.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | b.yousefi | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | dmacharya | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-11 | Ajay.dhariwal | 73 | view |
- Some people say cheap air travel is good because it enables ordinary people to travel. While others argue that it is bad for environment. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Many working people get little to no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have health problems as a result Why do many working people not get enough exercise What can be done about this problem 56
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job what other factors should be considered 56
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good, while others believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun graduates is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...are difficult to study. Since there are less graduates of these courses, that is why...
^^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun professors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...efits. In order to fill the vacuum of less professors from science and mathematics...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, as a result, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31707317073 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9143790071 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545731707317 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6500315258 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169202943958 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647769934487 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702241499695 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987306770772 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049416982876 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.