Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?
In this globally connected world, it is a common practice to import and export food items from and to other countries either it is far or is in the neighbourhood. It is being observed that some people consider the local food usage beneficial to the environment and to the economy. I also think there many advantage of prefering the local item over the imported item.
Firstly, the locally produce items are available for people immediately after the production, in result of which items are fresh when it come for consumption. Moreover, it would not effect our health and digestive system negatively. Consequently, the burden on the government for medical expenditure is decreases which is an important sector in expense list of the government.
Another major advantage is that it keeps revolving the economic cycle of the country. When we use our own produced crops, it helps the farmer which are counted as unprivilege citizen and the most needy section of the society. For instance, an agriculture based economy would comfortably get benefit from it.
Additionally, transportation cost of local transit is also a major factor which is way less than the importable item transition cost. While transportation globally produce more environmental hazzards, this would also increase the pollution on the planet. Therefore, it could also plays a critical role in reducing global warming.
The only drawback in relying on only locally develop items is its increased prices in the market but it is the case only when your country demand of a particular item is higher than the supply.
In conclusion, it is evident that the locally produce food items usage has positive impact on the economy of the country and the overall world environment. Therefore, it is certain that these advantages completely outweigh the disadvantages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-04 | abdulbasitku | 78 | view |
2020-01-04 | abdulbasitku | 56 | view |
2020-01-04 | abdulbasitku | 78 | view |
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 78
- You would like to buy some electrical goods at a shop in a nearby town.Write a letter to the shop and ask if they have the things you want or whether they will be able to order them. Ask what the prices are and how long they will be able to hold the goods 78
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 56
- Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 36
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advantage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advantages'.
Suggestion: many advantages
... and to the economy. I also think there many advantage of prefering the local item over the im...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...result of which items are fresh when it come for consumption. Moreover, it would not...
^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...for consumption. Moreover, it would not effect our health and digestive system negativ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 281, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'play'
Suggestion: play
...on the planet. Therefore, it could also plays a critical role in reducing global warm...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24324324324 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93052466277 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8333182504 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.466666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187337263468 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612537859916 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572744328707 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943729251807 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825147013574 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.