Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?
<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;">In this globally connected world, it is a common practice to import and export food items from and to other countries either it is far or is in the neighborhood. It is observed that some people consider local food usage beneficial to the environment and the economy. I also think there many advantages of </span>preferring<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;"> the local item over the imported item.
Firstly, the locally produced items are available for people immediately after the production, as a result of which items are fresh when they come for consumption. Moreover, it would not affect</span><span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;"> our health and digestive system negatively. Consequently, the burden on the government for medical expenditure is decreased which is an important sector in the </span>expense<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;"> list of the government.
Another major advantage is that it keeps revolving the economic cycle of the country. When we use our own produced crops, it helps the farmers which </span>are counted<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;"> as </span>unprivileged<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;"> citizens and the neediest section of the society. For instance, an agriculture-based economy would comfortably get benefit from it.
Additionally, the transportation cost of local transit is also a major </span>factor<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;"> which is way less than the </span>importable<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;"> item transition cost. While transportation globally produces more environmental </span>hazards<span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;">, this would also increase the pollution on the planet. Therefore, it could also play a critical role in reducing global warming.
The only drawback in relying on only locally develop items is its increased prices in the market but it is the case only when your country's demand for a particular item is higher than the supply.
In conclusion,</span><span style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); font-family: "Akkurat Std", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 19.36px;"> locally produced food items usage has positive impacts on the economy of the country and the overall world environment. Therefore, it is certain that these advantages completely outweigh the disadvantages.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | abdulbasitku | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | abdulbasitku | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | abdulbasitku | 78 | view |
- Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 36
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 78
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 78
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 56
- You would like to buy some electrical goods at a shop in a nearby town.Write a letter to the shop and ask if they have the things you want or whether they will be able to order them. Ask what the prices are and how long they will be able to hold the goods 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ...gher than the supply. In conclusion, ^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3995.0 1615.20841683 247% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 509.0 315.596192385 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.84872298625 5.12529762239 153% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.99636545233 2.80592935109 178% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.381139489194 0.561755894193 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1059.3 506.74238477 209% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 197.12414588 49.4020404114 399% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 266.333333333 106.682146367 250% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 33.9333333333 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0410823957225 0.244688304435 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406834968522 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459579213233 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0379672513779 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293348302022 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.5 13.0946893788 248% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -4.32 50.2224549098 -9% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.44779559118 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.1 11.3001002004 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 28.84 12.4159519038 232% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 9.78957915832 230% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 10.7795591182 213% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.