Many individuals believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
In today’s technology driven world, websites such as Facebook, are not only used to connect with each other but it also a source of valid or invalid information. Many people believe that such websites are impacting society and its members negatively. I am in partial agreement with this statement shall explain the same in this essay.
The impact of social media on each individual is positive in many ways and there are various merits of it. Firstly, there are many individuals associated with one or more social networking websites. This is connecting people from one country to another and have brought world closer. Earlier, people never even imagined that they can be in touch with their friends or families but sites as Facebook have made it possible. Secondly, social groups on Facebook allow members of similar interests to interact with each other.
On the other hand, the reach of social media is vulnerable and can impact negatively if not adapted in correct manner. Rather than taking part in the local community, people are interested in knowing other people online. Social gatherings are reducing day by day and people are bending towards online communication. Furthermore, the whole society is becoming disjointed and fragmented as people tend to spend more time online with people they have never met face to face and who they might never meet in future as well.
In conclusion, although social networking sites have brought people closer, they have not had the same effect on local community. Local communities should engage more activities to create and maintain interest of individuals towards community life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61393695971 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577358490566 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0621708733 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5714285714 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220336892191 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832388212025 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685148299342 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138289592987 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638507684651 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.