Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why is this the case? What can be done to attract local people?
Opinions are divided on why museums and historical places are mostly visited by foreigners, and not by the country's indigenous population. I believe that being familiar is the main reason behind this trend, and the solution lies in advertising.
This phenomenon of more tourists than local visitors at art galleries and ancient buildings is for various reasons, most important of which relate to lack of interest and waste of money. With regard to the former, local residents have already grown up visiting local attractions and find it boring to visit the same places again and again, and that is why these are foreigners who visit these places frequently to learn the cultural heritage of other countries. Perhaps affordable air travel is another factor that encourages locals to explore foreign places than their own countries. As far as money is concerned, entry ticket to cultural sites is generally expensive and nobody would want to squander one's money to witness same artwork. For these reasons, local people are discouraged to visit ancient places and these are mostly magnets for tourists.
Encouraging members of the local society and offering discounted tickets offer the best chance of attracting them to historical sites. Local authorities promoting the importance of these places in adverts is the best example to encourage the locals to visit, and another would be to organize educational trips for schoolchildren to old museums and art galleries. Not only would this motivate youngsters to learn about their history and culture, but parents could also learn the importance of visiting these places. Offering special discounts on tickets on weekends, and organizing cultural events and art exhibitions at these buildings are some other ways with which government could increase the number of local visitors to such places of art and history.
In conclusion, the reason for the less popularity of museums and ancient buildings among local people is because of lack of interest and waste of financial resources. This problem could be alleviated by advertising these sites, organizing cultural programmes and offering subsidised entry tickets for locals.
- Some people believe that elderly employees are more useful to a company while others believe that young employees are better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 62
- The movement of people from villages to cities for work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems associated with this What measures can be taken to solve these problems 78
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough time on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Nowadays pollution and waste levels are increasing rapidly How does this affect ordinary people What steps can be taken to overcome this problem 84
- Some people believe that price is the only consideration when buying something Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and include relevant examples 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nsive and nobody would want to squander ones money to witness same artwork. For thes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37317784257 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71595587025 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521865889213 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4531037191 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.769230769 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282995877179 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103836360997 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499843843166 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180095602687 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272546852311 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.