Since decades, money has the controlling power over everything as it can buy anything. Most of the guardians believe that teaching the importance of money to their children is beneficial. I firmly believe value of money from young age will help them become financially stable later on in life. Engaging them in monthly budgets and use of cash for payments while shopping will cultivate a sense of responsility which will be dicussed in detail in the upcoming paragraphs.
The predominant reason associated with teaching the value of money is financial independance in life. Parents should impart knowledge about how we earn the money after rigrous hardwork and how to wisely spend the hard earned money, otherwise, they will indulge in misleading activities. It truly builds a foundation for financial stability in young adulthood. For instance, children who come from rich families often misuse the money and indulge in drugs and alchohal which ruins their life physically and mentally. Because children can be mislead by surroundings, parents should be careful while giving money to their counterparts and should not give as much money they ask for. Hence, to make children understand the importance of money is essential.
So, what are the probable methods to teach young? Firstly, engaging children in weekly or monthly budget would help them to learn how to spend money wisely. They will have an idea of how money plays an imperative role in our daily survival. Hence, it will prevent them become extravagent. Secondly, taking children for shopping and use case for payment will eventually enhance the level of understanding and responsility. For example, using cash for purchasing things instead card helps to understand the equivalency of cash and quantity of product.
To summerize, it is essential for children to learn the value of money in order to make them financially strong and overall successful by involving them in day-to-day spends.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24522292994 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78505142149 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9869216451 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321616037943 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111928762923 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774731869641 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203396384053 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435488064333 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24522292994 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78505142149 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9869216451 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321616037943 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111928762923 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774731869641 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203396384053 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435488064333 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.