Many people believe that healthy eating and the importance of healthy food should be taught in schools. Others say that parents should teach their kids about healthy food and diet. Discuss both views, and give your opinion with relevant examples.
People’s eating habits are changing all the time. In this day and age, people use less time than before for eating because there is so much going on with their life. Less and less family pay attention to what they and their children eat. More junk foods are being consumed without a second thought which is very bad for health. This raises the question of who is responsible to educate the importance of nutrient-rich food to the young generations?
On one hand, it is obvious that the most influencers to children are their parents. Children look upon their parents as the role model figures. Children always consider the parents as their first teachers. Moreover, when staying in the same house, it is the parents who prepare all the food for their child, hence, if the parents have good eating habits, the children have them too. For instance, my mother always cooked vegetables even though I didn’t like it when I was a little child that make salad is a must in my diets nowadays.
On the other hand, children spend a lot of their time in school, learning from their teachers. This makes the teacher another important actor in the quest of helping a child realize what food should be consumed. If the teachers made a healthy choice on the food they take, they will leave an impression of that choice to their pupils too. Besides, not every parent aware of their choice of consumables, thus, teachers could be the better givers of knowledge.
In summary, I believe that it has to be a combined effort from both sides. Both parents and teachers should help to raise the awareness of children's healthy food consumption in order to prevent any kinds of diseases that could affect the young one through their diet patterns.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, thus, as to, for instance, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73509933775 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37979743134 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4887032817 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.375 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272480638039 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839655289211 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457360303232 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170946918357 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554393174313 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.