Holding International games such as the Olympic Games is an exciting event. Some people think it is positive while others argue it is waste of money. Discuss both.
International games such as the Olympic or the World Cup is a prestigious event that many countries are competing to host. While the value of the event in terms of financial and exposure brings to the host country cannot be denied, there are still opinions against the idea. In this essay, I will try to address this from both sides.
To begin with, a highly respected international event no doubt will bring a lot of attention and potentially a huge amount of money through tourism and related services. For instance, the World Cup is a sporting event held every four years that see the competition of the 32 best footballing countries around the world. People from over the world travel to the host country to attend the games live or millions of people watch through TV, online stream platform that brings money for the host country through tourism and advertisement.
Another value-added is the development of the country’s infrastructure. In order to support a huge event that is in the attention of the world, the host country must invest in its roads, stadiums, training centers, hotels. This investment is not only for the event but also could be utilized after it had finished. For example, when hosted the Sea Games event in 2010, Vietnam had built a national stadium with a capacity of 60 thousand seats that are still in use for today’s games.
On the other hand, hosting such an event may cause damage to a country's economy. If the planning was not carefully planned, the income of an event may not able to cover all the expenses thus putting the host country in debt. Furthermore, having a lot of tourists in one place may raise a concern for local security.
In summary, there are advantages and disadvantages that needed to be considered. But usually, the advantages are far better so that countries are jumping at the chance to host such an event.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in summary, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78703703704 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6653571173 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2892083036 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181436196661 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642447817921 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610157060025 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105630345645 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379251361083 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.