Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them

Essay topics:

Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them.

Our modern world is busy with so many cases that grabs the attention of mass public, one of these is the case of wild animals protection. In a recent survey there has been a debate between whether wild animals care takers should protect all wild animals or should they protect only some of the species. I am taking the side that we should only protect some of the species rather than all.

First of all, we will have to go through the opinion that animal specialists with the help of governments should protect all types of wild animals. The reasons behind this view is based on a scientific fact that animals and creatures are helping in the balance of the nature system. While the other reason is based on an economic fact that wild animals do help in the economy of countries as some of these animals are raised to be one of the food sources to people. On one hand this is so true, but on the other hand we have to review the other side of this survey study.

The other side of this debate is why do people have to protect all types of wild animals while they can only protect a selective few and give the required care. As we all hear in the news and read in papers, there are so many species of creatures that are on the verge of extinction; thus, we should give care and focus to such species. On the other hand, there are many species that are being used in medical studies to help create medicines to our today diseases; such animals should be protected even more to make sure they do not go extinct by excessive researches. I do prefer the idea of selective protection of wild animals as they should have a higher priority in care.

While there are people voting to have all kinds of wilder creatures protected, there are many others that have voted to protect the ones in actual need of protection. In my opinion, selective protection is more logical and applicable in the real world rather than protecting all kinds of animals.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-03 lakhveer khokhar 73 view
2021-05-03 elham mousavi 78 view
2020-12-16 Qamarbek 56 view
2020-10-19 Anupama Barooah 73 view
2020-09-05 raeed.kriez 61 view
Essays by user raeed.kriez :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ublic, one of these is the case of wild animals protection. In a recent survey there ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ild animals or should they protect only some of the species. I am taking the side that we s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ng the side that we should only protect some of the species rather than all. First of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, while, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45251396648 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24632418585 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432960893855 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.0477063309 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5384615385 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453547228423 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183582409267 0.084324248473 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909959366379 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302446359362 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702581044441 0.056905535591 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.