Education these days has become a debatable topic which has dissimilar views with different types of people. Some believe, practically oriented learning would yield better benefits than theoretical learning. On the other side of the argument a few prefer to have theoretical guidance along side the practical counter part of learning, I strongly stand with this ideology of education. This essay will delve into the various aspects of having theoretical approach of learning which will also strengthen practical experience of the subject.
Talking about the theoretical approach of learning, It forms a strong base for gaining experience in practical studies. Theoretical learning guides the learner to have a firm approach towards practicality of the subject. Furthermore, learning and understanding theoretically before engaging into practical part of the subject will build a strong base and strengthen the practical knowledge as well. Book learning acts as the key instructions for practical experience hence, it has a massive impact on the favourable expected results.
Merely learning practically and ignoring the theory portion will require plenty of resources and experienced ideas to reach the expected outcome. In this instance, lack of theoretical knowledge will lead to inability of meeting the expected results.
To conclude, theoretical knowledge is critical and must be combined with practical studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
...few prefer to have theoretical guidance along side the practical counter part of learning,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, well, as to, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 211.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75355450237 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99112588807 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563981042654 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8671991786 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253587316524 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109816147756 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070217642388 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155853765594 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457407891947 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.