Many people in the undeveloped world die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication to treat themselves. Do you believe that drug companies in the developed world should be obliged to make their products available at reduced prices in these undeveloped countries so that people do not die unnecessarily?
Since ancient times, people on earth have been greatly affected by dangerous diseases such as smallpox, bubonic plague, malaria, tuberculosis, cholera, etc. and modern epidemics such as h5n1, sars, ebola, etc. These plagues have long become a terrible danger to mankind. When outbreaking, they could be easily taken millions of lives, if there was no timely cure. Therefore, medical research and development by reputable pharmaceutical companies in powerful countries have contributed to fighting back these diseases. And as we all know, the expenses of researching the medical system is the main reason for the high expense of medicine. But in my opinion, medical products in general and especially medicines in particular should be marked prices down or distributed free to all countries in the world, especially to the least developed countries.
There is no doubt that the primary aim of every medication is to keep patients healthy, therefore these giant drug corporations inevitably play an indispensable role in medical treatment. But it must be claimed that due to the extremely high prices of medicines, so understandably patients in the less developed countries are unable to buy medications prescribed by doctor's treatments. Therefore, the supporting programs of the pharmaceutical firms could greatly assist people in underdeveloped worlds who are suffering from poor health care system and the severe deficiency in effective modern medicines. And in addition, the programs of drug discount and free drug distribution could offer the opportunity to save people who threatened by diseases and unable to afford to pay for vital medicines.
Moreover, the generous sponsors in these programs can enjoy long-term economic profits. Instead of bearing enormous expenses in advertising, financing pharmaceutical support schemes is a feasible and effective alternative. Furthermore, this is a golden opportunity to prove the great (tremendous) and powerful impact of these pharmaceutical products. It can be said that the more effective drugs are, the better reputation of which the company made those drugs is increasing.
In conclusion, assistance programs of major pharmaceutical corporations around the world could bring huge benefits not only to themselves but also to poor people in underdeveloped countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-14 | mrmonsterhydra | 89 | view |
- Many people in the undeveloped world die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication to treat themselves Do you believe that drug companies in the developed world should be obliged to make their products available at reduced p 89
- Some people argue that it is important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a happy life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays communicating with others is faster and easier thanks to technology like email cellular phones and beepers Has this change improved the way people live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- The world would be a better place if we all spoke the English language besides the mother tongue Do you agree 78
- Modern technology has increased our material wealth but not our happiness To what extent do you agree 94
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64857142857 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17551988352 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597142857143 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.380892302 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5625 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185456301655 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515221878532 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434910470601 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104013621697 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389081560492 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64857142857 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17551988352 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597142857143 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.380892302 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5625 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185456301655 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515221878532 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434910470601 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104013621697 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389081560492 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.