Many teenagers now have the their own smartphone what are the advantages and disadvantages of this and give your opinion

Having smartphone for teenagers is useful around their environment, being the advantages, while a number of people argue that adolescents having smartphone can bring harmful to them. Also, I believe this leads to effect for their performance in schools.

Initially, a gadget ownership for a number of teenagers leads them away from crimes, leading to their parents will feel cozy when they leave their children outside their guard. However, other people consider that those tend to depend on their smarphone, resulting to ignore the people around them. Research study of Indonesia in 2020 found that more 75% of teenagers used the GPS in their smartphone to share their location to parents when they were kidnapped. On the other hand, my nephew is difficult to be controlled due to playing games in his smartphone, and he does not obey their parent.

Granted, a plethora of young children use smartphones, especially for lessons at the schools, leading to get good impact on the development of their learning pattern. This is because they get a wider range of learning resources than the teachers in their schools, comparing the suitable learning for them. For instance, in North Sumatra, there are 80% of schools allow students to bring smartphones, while the teacher runs out of explaining lessons, like mathematics, and the teacher ask students to open Youtube to find the same questions in other ways, and if they are more suitable to follow the method of that platform, the teacher will welcome it.

To conclude, having own smartphone in young children will bring benefits, although there are those who argue the reverse. Albeit I believe that bringing a smartphone will improve children's ability to learn at schools. Are there other ways to improve those other than carrying a smartphone?

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...on their smarphone, resulting to ignore the people around them. Research study of Indonesia in 2020 fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64660823459 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540816326531 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7152940338 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178591724056 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756157300973 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533773651719 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123927743967 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623695357728 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.