Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
In these salad days of the millennium, machines are playing a crucial role in making life easier. Most of the household chores are done by machines instead of hands. This essay will cast light on the positive and negative aspects of this development.
The greatest advantage of using machines for the everyday task is it saves time. To be more precise, machines do the work quickly and one does not have to spend a great deal of energy on finishing the task. To exemplify, some home appliances such as washing machine, blender, and vacuum cleaner are used by women to complete the work swiftly without getting exhausted. Another advantage lies behind this notion is the tasks done by machines are quite accurate. For instance, a microwave is used so that food gets cooked without being burnt. Hence, machines play a vital role in saving time as well as doing the work with precision.
However, every coin has two sides. In spite of various merits of using machines at home, there are some demerits that are not negligible. To explain it further, machines have propelled people to live a sedentary lifestyle. This has further increased the risks of obesity, high blood pressure, and other illness. Additionally, people have become more dependent on machines. The work gets hampered if any machine stops working or is under repair. Reluctance is shown to find the other alternative or to do the work manually. Therefore, the increased usages of machines have put the people not only into bad shape but also have enhanced health issues.
To recapitulate, even though machines have augmented health-related concerns, people have gained a lot in terms of time-saving, and accuracy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d negative aspects of this development. The greatest advantage of using machines...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64566453208 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4448637287 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.2222222222 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151392285254 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482850863765 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492460460486 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806715297294 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671754043972 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.