Many young people are leaving their homes in rural areas to study or work in the cities. What are the reasons? Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages?
In this modern era, the majority of people moving to urban areas from rural areas because of the lack of facilities, employment, and education. Some opine argue that the advantages of this migration are more compare to disasvantageous. In my opinion, it is more beneficial to live in the city.
There are plenty of reasons behind this moving trend. The first and foremost reason is education facilities and methods. Most of the universities and colleges are located in the cities. Not only that, people can explore their knowledge and new skills during their education in the university. Besides that, people can easily find employment after graduation and improve their financial status.
There are a plethora of advantages if people travell to town from the village. To initiate, they can get a better education and lifestyle with some facilities. To illustrate, in the cities schools and colleges are more focused on the practical knowledge rathar than theory. Additionally, more and more children get a higher education. By doing so, the literacy rate of the nation becomes higher. What is more, youngsters can easily find employment after graduation. Not only that, even uneducated people find a job in automotive shops and factories. In that way, they can improve their lifestyle and financial condition.
On the downside, there are some negative developments in this situation. To begin with, towns become overcrowded. As a result, the government and people have to face many problems such as traffic, pollution, and accommodation. To add to this, the unemployment rate will be increasing with the population. Moreover, the next generation would not have any knowledge about cultures and traditions. They start to follow a global culture. In that way, the native culture and tradition become destroy.
To sum up, in this technical era, students like to get higher education and telephone numbers salary. Because of that, they prefer to live in cities. "Every argument has two sides" same as have an urban and ruler area. But, live in the city is more beneficial rather than in the village.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-05 | SKN | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-08 | jass26 | 92 | view |
| 2020-02-12 | sdpatel647 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Jyoti_dhillon | 86 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | marukap | 79 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 56
- Many young people are leaving their homes in rural areas to study or work in the cities What are the reasons Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 56
- Many people say that movies and TV programmes affect us negatively while others say that they are two influential and useful media for us How do movies and TV affect us 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s more beneficial to live in the city. There are plenty of reasons behind this ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21407624633 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85703953413 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533724340176 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 4.76152304609 315% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8192784251 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.8518518519 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6296296296 20.7667163134 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188396373954 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043387889257 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412893822812 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101273884436 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358713560727 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.