Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development?
Modern times have shown large scale wedding, incurring high costs as compared to past weddings. There are enormous reasons for this development which will be analyzed in following paragraphs. I consider this to be a negative development not only for the individual family but also for the society as a whole.
Predominantly, the evident reason for extravagant wedding events occurred cause of social status stress families bear. People nowadays have more expandable income as compared to past which leads them to organize grand wedding events with undue expenses in order to show off their sound financial status. Since this become a norm, expectations from the families brings a lot of pressure to impress the guests with luxurious decors and other outstanding arrangements. I personally know a family, who spent a lot of amount on irrelevant arrangements just to impress the in-laws and other guests, the same amount could have been shared with needy people around them.
These investments certainly pose a lot of detrimental effects on couple’s life. The amount spent on grand event would become a problem to repay and leads to unpleasant future. For instance, there are certain cases where people borrow handsome amount of money in order to spend on the wedding and in the end selling their assets for repayment. Irrational approach & maintenance of social status got these couple into long term trouble of financial instability
In summation, expensive weddings and humongous expenditures spent on two to three days event is encouraged nowadays which ultimately put few people into inferiority complex and other’s in financial insecurity. Instead of organizing grand weddings people should spend their money for charitable purposes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
... I personally know a family, who spent a lot of amount on irrelevant arrangements just to impr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng term trouble of financial instability In summation, expensive weddings and hum...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41391941392 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8396975073 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9368579393 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115624337674 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410869856561 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457533808018 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694411004137 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443618968295 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.