Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?What is your opinion on that?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant eviden

Essay topics:

Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?
What is your opinion on that?
Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
You should write at least 250 words.

It is commonly believed by many that most of the high-profile jobs have equipped by male members of the society. It is a great matter of argument that government should reserve some percentage of such jobs for women. In my opinion, this reservation is not required as women are potentially qualified to grab any job through her skills and talent.
To begin with, women’s are the powerful section of the society today. Gone are the days, when females were treated inferior to males. These days, we can see woman in every field of work ranging from a bus conductor to an astronaut. For example, we have woman pilots who drive airplanes, woman army members and not to a surprise we have spacewomen who had proved nothing is impossible for females. To name a few fields, womans combat each other in beauty pageants, In sports field also, Sania mirza is the best badminton player in the world, Kalpana Chawla, the first female astronaut from India, followed by Sunita williams and most of the specialist surgeons around the world are females. Women had made their space wherever needed and they do not need a reservation.
Also, I believe that this 21st century is a world of woman's power. Women are highly qualified and equally eligible for high-profile jobs. I don't believe that female reservation for high-level job is a wise suggestion because reservations are meant to benefit the weaker sections of society such as differently-abled people or minority section of the population. It would be a discrimination to secure a percentage of seats for them. It would be more disrespectful to them and would not be an encouraging decision.
In conclusion, the decision to reserve seat for women in high-profile jobs is not encouraging. women have their own identity and ability; they had proved from their achievements that they are not less than men in any way and they have been found in various high profile jobs as well thus do not need any reservation quota.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-17 aringa 67 view
2019-12-16 Prabhp 73 view
2019-12-16 Prabhp 73 view
2019-07-11 Saira Faiz 89 view
2019-07-01 BIBHU KALITA 78 view
Essays by user harmankaur :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...rful section of the society today. Gone are the days, when females were treated inf...
^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ually eligible for high-profile jobs. I dont believe that female reservation for hig...
^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Women
...n high-profile jobs is not encouraging. women have their own identity and ability; th...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89221556886 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80806402435 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0036146413 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228846613532 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793372359758 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631630153119 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148483873423 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591369098147 0.056905535591 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.