Parents, usually mothers, stay at home to look after their family. People believe they should receive a salary from the government for that. Do you agree or disagree?
Women often deprioritize their careers for raising their children or taking care of elder people at home. Some people believe that the government should financially assist those women as a reward. I strongly oppose the idea as this will adversely affect the economy and demotivate working women class. I shall elaborate my stance with valid arguments and examples in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, providing some sort of monetary assistance to the women staying home will put a tremendous burden on the economy. Countries like India and Pakistan are already struggling to fight against major issues such as poverty and food supply, this approach will add an extra financial burden. According to the recent research of the UN, poverty ratio in the developing countries has doubled as compared to the past decade. Thus, the government should focus on eradicating bigger problems rather than providing unemployment allowance to mothers.
To elucidate my stance further, the initiative of awarding housewives will bring demotivation among working women. Those women are struggling hard to keep a balance with house chores and office tasks. They would be inclined to sit at home and receive allowances instead of going out and making any effort to earn money. Eventually, the government would end up paying all stay-home-mothers. For instance, there are many families in the UK and USA that take unemployment allowance from the government over false medical reasons. This idea will encourage people to stay at home more and earn less.
To summarize, the idea of financially assisting mothers is not rational from any aspect. The government can assist these mothers in the form of insurance or free medical. The government should also encourage housewives to invest their spare time in online jobs and earn money while staying at home.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, thus, while, for instance, sort of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26101694915 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75454965634 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616949152542 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0449438538 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231457957913 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721683144654 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673743117386 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140468043867 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456184740497 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.