Computer Technology is getting cheaper and so it is likely that adults will be working from home and children will study from home.
Is it a positive or negative development?
This is the era of science and technology and everything is changing quite rapidly. With all the advancements in technology, we can now access any information by sitting at our place be it educational material or have to meet someone with business motives. This is a humongous achievement which helped people in enormous ways, few of which I will try to explain further.
This technical advancement played a positive role in the field of education. Distant learning is one of the major achievement of this change. Previously, when anyone opt to go for specialization in any field, he or she had to travel miles in order to get required education. Whereas, in current times, via online distant learning programs, things become easily available on one clink. Which eventually saves time, money and efforts at the same time.
Same is the case with job market where resource optimization is new and most happening thing. With growing technology, more and more people are now inclined towards e-commerce business and creating online jobs, thus saving their cost of offices and utilities. Additionally, companies are also promoting culture of flexible working where they are asking employees to work from their home in order to achieve resource optimization. In continuation to this, by offering home based jobs over internet, we can encourage the house wives to contribute in their country’s economy.
To recapitulate, I must say that change is always good when it creates ease in the life of people. By making education and work accessible for every individual at their own space will benefit companies as well as employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'opts'.
Suggestion: opts
...of this change. Previously, when anyone opt to go for specialization in any field, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14716981132 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93121815494 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656603773585 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4681157916 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114992436327 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324323048251 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417324491756 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601427599712 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249334639326 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.