More and more people use private cars instead of taking public transport. What are the reasons for this trend? How can the government encourage people to take public transport?
The ever-increasing number of personal vehicles has sparked heated debates about why people prefer to use their cars rather than using mass transport. Convenience and showing off are usually attributed as the most two common reasons, however there are several feasible solutions can be taken by the government to make public transport be first choice of people.
There are many reasons why personal convenience and projecting personal wealth should be taken into account for increasing usage of private motorcars. First, since the personal cars have been providing numerous benefits and convenience for users, it is extremely hard for people to find their excuses of not using this kind of transport. For example, inhabitants only need to walk a few steps from the house to their cars and drive it to their intended destination without spending times at bus stations under some weather constraints such as raining, snowing or heating. Second, possessing a private car are nowadays usually implied of projecting their wealth or success, which encourages people to purchase personal car as soon as they can in order to demonstrate to other that they are wealthy. This means that owning a car is mostly considered as one of the top priority of people nowadays, which contribute to the growing number of personal vehicle on road.
Fortunately, there are some workable approaches that can be taken by the authority to fortify people to use massive transport system. First, widening public transport system would be the first mission that Government has to enhance in order to marginalize the inconvenience of public transport, by executing this plan, locals will hardly find further excuses to use their personal cars. Plenty of researches have shown that one of the most reasons which refrains people taking public transport, is the bus route does not reach to their areas, which is why many people prefer possessing a car rather than using public transport. Another measure can be taken is to increase cost of driving into metropolitan areas, which could be done through augmenting toll fees and park fees in central places. By imposing this rising of charges, driver would definitely think twice before taking their car into city and together with a upgraded public transport system, they will highly switch their commute to buses or trains.
In conclusion, nevertheless there are some reasons can persuade people using personal vehicles rather than taking public transport, the circumstance can be improved by fostering mass transport system and imposing higher charges. In order to achieve highest effectiveness, these two approaches are recommended to be executed together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 920, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...g their car into city and together with a upgraded public transport system, they ...
^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'achieve the highest'.
Suggestion: achieve the highest
...nd imposing higher charges. In order to achieve highest effectiveness, these two approaches are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29107981221 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70472250255 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509389671362 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9997680884 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.0 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363217615492 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137619293239 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922779562368 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241089967545 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536776700323 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.