Since most information about culture and history can be found online, museums are no longer needed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Traditional museums have exceptional collections that carrying its existence since long time and with the advancement of technology one can have all the information from internet pertaining to specific item even they do not need to visit the museum personally. I partially agree with the statement that in modern era, museums are no longer required due to availability of information online and will discuss my viewpoints in the following essay.
It is undeniable to say that crowd visiting to museums have drastically decreased as most of the today's generation losing interest to museums. The primary reason for decreasing footfall is that people can conveniently have required information by searching specific item online. They do not consider visiting museums as it demands their extra time, efforts and money which they want to ignore and searching on internet is quite inexpensive compared to personally visiting the museum. Another reason can be they easily get bored with the old sculptures, paintings, books, ancient guns and ammunition, mummified bodies and other things. Mostly people who are studying relating to history, culture, scientific and artistic courses tends to visit museums.
On the contrary, museums have vast number of collections of different things which can amaze any person. Also a person can learn more by visiting a museum personally rather than watching images and content pertaining to it. Now a days, museums are attracting general public by organising spacial events like exhibitions to lure youngsters. Museums play vital role to preserving the historical and cultural aspects of any country.
In conclusion, it is irrefutable to say that more efforts involved while visiting a museum personally rather than watching and reading about collections of museum items by online. However, museums are integral part of a country which reflects its importance of culture, heritage and history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ve drastically decreased as most of the todays generation losing interest to museums. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich they want to ignore and searching on internet is quite inexpensive compared t...
^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rent things which can amaze any person. Also a person can learn more by visiting a m...
^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...ng images and content pertaining to it. Now a days, museums are attracting general public ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...mages and content pertaining to it. Now a days, museums are attracting general public ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... it. Now a days, museums are attracting general public by organising spacial events like exhib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48322147651 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87054598164 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4412844289 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.692307692 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221987634085 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740593650013 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426364182006 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133529478784 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590215598826 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.