Most of the people in the cities are not familiar with their neighbours.
What are the causes of this?
What solutions can you suggest?
Living style in the urban areas is different as Compared to rural ones. People residing in the former have fast pace of life and usually do not know actually who is living in their next or front door. The main reason for this is the shift in the ways of spending life. The most viable solution for this will be to create awareness among people for having strong community values.
One of the most significant cause of individuals not being in contact with their neighbours is the paradigm shift in the ways of living. They have to work for longer hours in order to earn a handsome amount of money to make the ends meet. As a result, they do not have enough time to spend neither at home nor to meet the people residing adjacent to their homes. To narrate, it was found out in a survey that due to the change in lifestyle approach 80% of the people are not aware of the residents in their locality.
The most reasonable solution to this would be to run electronic or print media campaigns persuading people to have strong community bonds. Furthermore, fortnightly or monthly some functions can be arranged to indulge people to participate in these so that they get to know each other and exchange words. When they would greet in the meetings, they would be able to realize the significance of familiarizing with each other, and might develop friendship relationships with the street residents. To exemplify, following this practice in Japan resulted in 53% improvement to have good neighbors relationships.
To conclude, a large number of urban dweller do not have even a small contact with their neighbors. This us because of the alteration in the lifestyles. However, it can be solved by making public aware of the importance of mingling in their neighborhood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ghbors relationships. To conclude, a large number of urban dweller do not have even a small ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, however, if, so, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78827361564 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69307246195 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557003257329 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9545391973 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212234303748 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691335027391 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419205906011 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129045860125 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00833910703949 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.