News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported?

Essay topics:

News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported?

News editors have the power of making or shaping a country through their articles. It is often argued that most news editors modify the content to suit their agendas. In any country, it has been a concern for many citizens to get a newsfeed from a reliable source. However, it has been very difficult to pick out from the mammoth of choices. If asked, news editors would give their fair share of reasoning why they edit content for their purpose. And in the process, in multifarious ways, it gets badgered. There are factors such as gaining the interest of the audience, supporting the sponsors, helping their business grow, competition among the media houses.
In their zest to attract mass crows, news editors often make sensational headlines. One would get the whole context wrong if not careful. They start with the headline as – “Did Mukul murder Aditya?” instead of writing as “probe into Aditya murder case” as the later would not grab any attention thereby resulting in low TRP ratings. Sometimes, editors choose to write what the content provider wants for the sake of money. After all, the main goal of any media houses is to achieve high profits. They will try really hard to ensure their profits without any concern to the ethical practices.
In some cases, we even see some editors prefer one political party over the other. Sometimes it is alleged that some of the media outlets are paid and sponsored by the governments. And in other cases, editors are just biased towards a political party and mislead people through their articles in a subtle way. There are occasions where editors were themselves provided with wrong information and they relied on it due to time constraints.
In summary, there are many reasons, although unjustifiable, that influence an editor to modify content in the newspapers and T.V channels. In their zeal to achieve higher profits, editors often resort to such practices as grabbing the attention of mass crowds through misleading headlines, by publishing false paid content, by showing biasedness, and sometimes due to lack of proper information. Media houses need to be strictly regulated in order to restrict the overwhelming editions of true content.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-07 Mahender4iel 84 view
Essays by user Mahender4iel :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the other. Sometimes it is alleged that some of the media outlets are paid and sponsored by...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a subtle way" with adverb for "subtle"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d mislead people through their articles in a subtle way. There are occasions where editors were...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
... modify content in the newspapers and T.V channels. In their zeal to achieve high...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, really, so, after all, in summary, such as, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07923497268 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62803042977 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1754766118 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.95 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12655392709 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382945742418 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454041772947 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697583376593 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288073166788 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.