News / Media has an influence on our life and some people think it can have a negative effect. Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.
It is argued that multimedia could have an adverse impact on people's lives. This essay agrees with this statement because they over exaggerate news for their own benefits and promote even wrong products for their financial gain.
Mass communication overemphasizes some news to gain higher attention from the public. They broadcast information in a manner to convince people that what they are telling is the ultimate truth and more people get influenced to watch their shows. As a result, they get a higher TRP (television rating points) which results in more business contracts. For example, as per the recent survey conducted by Times magazine, the news channels charge hefty amount from political parties to show the only positive side of their work to convince citizens to vote only to those candidates.
They promote products irresponsibly without knowing their harmful effects. The news telecasting agencies publish adverts for their income even if that product is hazardous to the consumer. Their first motive is to sell the product and if the product gets higher sales then their goal is achieved irrespective of the fact that product could be bad for people, society or environment For instance, various new channels highlight the problem regarding deteriorating air quality and at the time they promote adverts related to cigarette and tobacco. However, they do publish a warning for consumers to buy at your own risk.
To conclude, I believe mass media may have detrimental consequences on citizens lives because they overstress the master for their personal gains and even promote dangerous products for the extra income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: OVER_EXAGGERATED[1]
Message: Use simply 'exaggerate'.
Suggestion: exaggerate
...agrees with this statement because they over exaggerate news for their own benefits and promote...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28735632184 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68370498137 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.3889621489 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102138591137 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497283790382 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416775108119 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697848496818 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032085130972 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.