News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
It is sometimes argued that TV stories and newspapers should be accompanied by pictures. I do believe that it is very effective to accompany pictures with news.
On the one hand, pictured news can deliver the message quickly and effectively. The picture always will tell much more than blind news. Therefore, when we see a short of an event in one of our concerns, we try to get closer to the television and find out what is the matter. The role of picture is very significant and should be considered, as news without pictures will tend to be less attractive same like tough academic issue. For example, people now prefer the social media over any other way of news or events because it has two advantages which will complete the whole scene; firstly, all news or events are along with pictures. Secondly, it is an interactive way, since you can also be inside the event and become news maker.
On the other hand, the imaged news overcome the language diversity for some reasons. First, thinking globally is the most effective way telling the news and that could only happen by making difference through invented ways like “news in pictures”. Next, calling for people to participate in news by posting or sending photos through Facebook, Twitter or Whatsapp melt the people and break the language barriers. For example, many newspapers and international websites are allowing their readers to participate through posting and sending photos or clips that way encourage the readers by motivating them by involving them making them a part of the event and the most important thing it is also a way of getting trusted news from their original sources, since sending a video or a picture does not need an experienced journalist.
In conclusion, imaged news will ever still the most effective way which has to be encouraged and developed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-25 | deepshikha_sh01 | 85 | view |
| 2018-01-19 | harish.1009 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | elveslord77 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | elveslord77 | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | ilets1478963 | 67 | view |
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitor are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advantag 61
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 74
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitor are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advantag 61
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'tell'.
Suggestion: will always tell
...ge quickly and effectively. The picture always will tell much more than blind news. Therefore, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng difference through invented ways like apos;news in pictures apos;. Next, calli...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch has to be encouraged and developed.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92971246006 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61440258936 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552715654952 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.5135250935 49.4020404114 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => More facts,knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220512884091 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954998715202 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692259086774 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162003661199 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105035723511 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.