News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this?

In today's world, Television and newspapers are publishing more images to cover news stories. Many people believe including pictures have more impact than words, while others disagree. I agree with the former notion.

Firstly, Most of the people get the gist of the story through pictures, as they do not have time to read it. The reason is simple, they are working and occupied with a lot of activities in daily routine, As a result, they prefer to just read the headline and see pictures to understand it. For instance, most of them go through the newspaper while commuting to office and scroll all of it by just having a look on images with their headings. Thus having a picture is more beneficial for them due to lack of time. Similarly, It becomes easy for them to filter out the news stories they are interested in, for example, for many people, a story showing a picture of miss world is more like-able than it having an image of violent elements, consequently, pictures help in saving time.

Moreover, as it is well-known fact, a picture speaks more than a word, having a photo of a criminal on TV helps people to make themselves aware of the face and can inform the police if seen nearby, For example, one of the most wanted criminals in London was convicted by police when a lady called 911 seeing him near her house. As a result, number of criminals getting caught has increased tremendously due to their published picture. In Addition, it is true that we can feel more emotions by watching rather than reading, Like, seeing women saving a dog image has more impact than written about it or footballers image is more convincing than dancers'. Hence, picture effects human more than words.

To conclude, having images in TV and newspaper for new stories is more influential than just publishing long text about it, However, the publisher should keep in mind to avoid using pictures causing any dispute.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76047904192 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50771694343 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.9992431507 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246157871139 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989312464754 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074723671085 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166690264555 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259956158728 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.