Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the past, advancements in medicine were made using the 'trial and error' method on living and diseased humans. However, in recent times, testing on livestock has resulted in new and improved methodologies in medicine. A significant part of the populous believes that trials run on living organisms is unethical. The rest of the population thinks that medical marvels are a justifiable reason to continue conducting these experiments.
On one hand, some people are of the opinion that experimentation on living is morally wrong. Furthermore, they empathize with animals and are unwilling to allow such cruel and invasive tests to be conducted on them regardless of the benefits to humanity. They think that torturing livestock is too high a price to pay for advancements in medicine. Thus, they believe banning such experiments and trials is the logical and ethical step to take.
On the other hand, other people think that if animal testing is banned, medicine will stagnate and humanity might not be able to prevent and cure many diseases. Animal testing, according to them is a necessary evil and must be continued as it is the best possible research methodology available today. For example, without rigorous animal trials, mankind would not have cured dangerous diseases like Measles, Diptheria and Malaria.
In my opinion, experimenting on animals in labs has to occur for humans to live a disease free life. Furthermore, viruses constantly mutate and adapt to new medicine. This creates stronger versions of resistant viruses. Scientists are expected to provide a cure and treatment for the same. This would be incredibly difficult and time-consuming without animal testing and a lot of human lives could be lost in the process.
In conclusion, justifications to both sides of this issue are fair and justified. The fact that no better alternative exists to be able to completely ban animal experimentation, we must continue the trials. However, I believe the governing bodies from all around the world should actively research new methodologies to replace animal testing altogether.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...ine. A significant part of the populous believes that trials run on living organisms is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the logical and ethical step to take. On the other hand, other people think th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29640718563 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98618287754 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4185939637 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1052631579 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262387548581 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663050539479 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585585313278 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133571667818 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415984824558 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.