Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Like anything else, the issue that conduct tests on animals bears with itself two contradicting viewpoints. To be more specific, the question here is whether or not these experiments should be stopped due to its ruthless nature even though it is necessary for humanity. Nevertheless, to bring in reasons and explanations on my view, I believe that animal experiments are a great value to people’s lives. Following are further explanations to clarify my rendered opinion.
First of all, a quite convincing opinion to support the above position is that the advance of medical science depends on these such experiments. The strongest reason for supporting this is that millions of human lives are saving every year by medical treatments that base on the efficiency of animal experiments. For example, we are protected from many serious diseases thanks to the development of vaccines which had been relied on many tests on animals. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that the importance of these experiments is deniable.
The second reason why this issue is supported upon is that it is also beneficial to the economy, especially to prevent poverty. This is due to the fact that some natural disasters are diminished by science methodologies that was a result of animal experiments. For instance, the catastrophe of grasshopper are minimized because of repellents which should be tested in grasshopper and relevant animals. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that animal experiments is benefit in wide-range aspects.
On the contrary, what they fail to consider is abuse of animals in continuous experiments. For example, chimpanzee and monkey which are extremely abuse in these experiments are the interested subjects. Therefore, it is necessary to promulgate strict legislation that help to minimise animal abuse in experiments.
In conclusion, the above mentioned discussions have led to a confirmation that benefits of animal experiments is indispensable to human beings. Actually, it is effective solutions for the issues that are worth thinking further, and this is, more or less, an invitation to the specialist with quality expertise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | Andy Hoang | 80 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | saeedhassani | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | Sasuke0789 | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-11 | Ajayvir | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-29 | harmankaur1607 | 67 | view |
- Topic: There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music?Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 84
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 80
- Topic: The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain in the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lesson 89
- Topic: Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Despite huge improvements in healthcare, the overall standard of physical health in many developed countries is now falling. What could be the reason for this trend, and what can be done to reverse it? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... be more specific, the question here is whether or not these experiments should be stopped due...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, more or less, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 13.1623246493 236% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46587537092 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26743287651 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53412462908 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9235473352 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.352941176 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216436114371 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070041626439 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475451366773 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119045253232 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428962243511 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.