Nowadays, families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a nagative effect on children, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
An ever-increasing percentage of families have nowadays put their minds to immigrate to more flourished countries and seek for more fruitful job vacancies there. Regarding this fact, some households associate such movement with the revelation of destructive effects on their children’s lives, while others are in stark contrast and determine it as a constructive move. In the following, I am going to elaborate on both thoughts in depth and advocate the second group’s belief.
Picturing the detrimental impacts of moving to other countries makes parents rather infuriated. As soon as they step on another land, they claim, children are prone to exponential risks. By enrolling in a school, for instance, they must bite the bullet and face discriminations showed by instructors between native and immigrated pupils. Next probable aggregation would rely on the fact that getting together with an opposite gender is of a ubiquitous phenomenon in developed countries, yet it has not been thoroughly addressed in middle-east countries. Hence, children brought up in the nations the same as Iran may experience unexpected demeanours in the destined country which may result in early sexual affairs, unwanted pregnancy and so forth. Furthermore, on account of the fact that the locals may look down on such children, they have more chances to turn to pickpockets, forgers, muggers, vandals or even murderers and arsonists.
In spite of these above mentioned negative idea, other people hold the opinion that a more developed country will provide a secure context for the children to acquire a second language or if they were to attend an international academic institute, the students more or less got acquainted with diverse languages. It goes without saying that children can pursue their priorities and move up the ladder in a rewarding environment with more elite and sophisticated universities. This can be followed by more profitable to-be vacations.
I, personally, acknowledge that by settling down in a more prosperous world, children will undeniably have the world by their tail in different aspects ranging from being educated under the supervision of well-trained teachers to hunting highly prestigious jobs either in their country of origin or the adopted one.
Despite the aggregations, an immigration may impose on children, it will strongly embrace versatile virtues too. Provided that parents and other influential factors including schools and friends guide children into a productive path, they will irrefutably be sitting pretty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
An ever-increasing percentage of familie...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cate the second group's belief. Picturing the detrimental impacts o...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...als or even murderers and arsonists. In spite of these above mentioned negati...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by more profitable to-be vacations. I, personally, acknowledge that by settl...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountry of origin or the adopted one. Despite the aggregations, an immigration...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, look, may, regarding, second, so, well, while, for instance, in spite of, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52284263959 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06784241607 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637055837563 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1997229912 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.066666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170425361449 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527001898258 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415370297994 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900641496839 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038407710659 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.