Nowadays many historic buildings receive lack of preservation treatment, with some buildings being damaged or even destroyed. Why is this happening? What can be done to change this situation?
It has been observed that most buildings of historic importance are not well protected these days, due to which some are defaced while others are completely destroyed. In my opinion, this is happening because of meager budgets allocated by the government for the archeological department and also a lack of awareness in people about these national assets. A number of measures can be taken to improve the condition of historic sites.
Firstly, in a developing country like Pakistan, where the government does not have enough resources to provide for health and education, archeology is one of the least concerned departments and receives little money from the government. Deprived of sufficient resources, officials of the archeology department are unable to restore the historic buildings. Furthermore, people living near most historic sites are also not well aware of the importance of these archeological remains, due to which sometimes people tend to vandalize these sites. For example, Rohtas Fort in Jehlum is damaged by the actions of local villagers. Both of these problems are major causes of damage happening to historic buildings.
To solve these issues, the government will have to raise the budgets of departments looking after the historic sites. The department of archeology should also start a marketing campaign to promote archeological sites and earn revenue from tourism, which can be spent on the restoration of these sites. Moreover, the government should conduct awareness programs for local people. If people are versed with the importance of historic buildings, they will tend not to vandalize these places. Take the example of Europe, where even the castles of little historic importance are well protected because people are aware of their importance. Resources to preserve damaged sites and education of people are keys to the solution.
In conclusion, due to the lack of money and awareness, we are losing the buildings of historic importance, which are our national assets. This problem can only be solved if the government and society act together to raise budgets and awareness.
- Many people try to look younger than they really are. What are the reasons for that? Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for long time should be promoted to higher positions. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The fast food industry has negative effects on our health, the environment and family eating habits.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others Say that there are more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35135135135 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84817064798 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483483483483 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4008422262 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188612290155 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663184260784 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444767818497 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138789702263 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588672903967 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.