The fast food industry has negative effects on our health, the environment and family eating habits.
Do you agree or disagree?
Restaurants chains serving ready meals, for instance burgers and pizzas, are expanding quite fast, lately, and it is generally believed that such food is causing environmental and health challenges, as well as influencing our dietary habits, adversely. I am a proponent of the notion that junk food has a lot of harmful effects on our climate and health, but I do not support the idea that it is changing our dietary habits, badly.
Firstly, most of the burgers and pizzas are cooked by using huge quantities of oils for frying meat. While, intake of deep-fried meat and cheese may result into increased cholesterol levels, which is considered as the start of cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension and cardiac failure. Moreover, taking too much fried chicken and beef, which is most commonly used in fast food, can cause obesity. So excessive consumption of junk food, definitely, leads to health issues.
Secondly, to fulfill the demand of meat for fast food industry, livestock farm owners have to produce more chickens, and cows. Which means more livestock waste in the form of animal dung. Furthermore, consumption of meat has been linked with release of high amounts of carbon dioxide, which has harmful effects on our environment, for example, climate change and global warming. That means, eating too much fast food is also linked with climate change.
However, when it comes to dietary habits of a family, I do not believe that consumption of junk food has any effect on it, because a burger meal is also served by a restaurant just like traditional cuisine. Before the era of burger and pizza chains, families used to visit conventional food restaurants, like now they go to fast food chains, as youngsters and elderly both enjoy this food alike and it is also evident from family deals served by many junk food restaurants.
To sum up, I support the idea that foods like burgers and pizzas are affecting or fitness and environment, harmfully, but I do not agree with argument that it is also changing dietary habits of families, adversely.
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? 61
- Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods, more than ever before in most countries in the world. Is this a good or bad development? Give your opinion and examples. 56
- The fast food industry has negative effects on our health, the environment and family eating habits.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people try to look younger than they really are. What are the reasons for that? Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do many working people not get enough exercise?What can be done about this problem? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ave to produce more chickens, and cows. Which means more livestock waste in the form ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 447, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun junk seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much junk', 'a good deal of junk'.
Suggestion: much junk; a good deal of junk
...lso evident from family deals served by many junk food restaurants. To sum up, I suppo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7064250117 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561046511628 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.416044655 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.923076923 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255816844379 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884072552566 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680570139441 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138646496141 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673675391639 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.