Nowadays more takes at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? Is it a position or negative development.
Nowadays more tasks are being done by robots, both at home and workplace. The question is whether or not using robots in day to day life is a correct decision. In my personal opinion, it is true and shall reveal it further.
As far as workplace is concerned, robots sure take on a lot of work. Their a multiple reasons but to name a few, robots have high efficiency and high accuracy. This means that robots can do same task repeatedly with the same precision each and every time. It simply means that chances of error are very low as opposed to a situation where man was doing same task over and over. Machines do not get bored which means they can give a high production rate, after all they do not need to rest like us humans. Not only this but robots can multitask also. For instance - a CNC machine can do boring, tapering and shaping on different work piece at the same time.
If we focus at our homes then we would find that robots are required there as well. First of all, the safety issues. In the past women used 'chullas' powered by cow dung to boil and cook which produced a lot of smoke. Smoke entered their lungs and also thier eyes. Now chullas are replaced by microwaves which saves time, produces no smoke and is also safe for children. Other such areas include security because people install IR security cameras to see in dark to prevent theft. Air conditioners to replace water coolers as coolers were noisy and cause humidity in the room. Not to mention, to cope with global warming.
To cap this all I can say that using robots mostly has positive effect on us, in any field we can think of and should continue to make better robots to make world a better place to live in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-10 | Bikram1992 | 73 | view |
- How geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 61
- You traveled by long distance bus recently and your suitcase was damaged. Write a letter to bus company. In your letter inform the bus company of when and where you traveled, describe your suitcase and what happened to it, explain why the company should p 73
- You recently had your computer fixed at a local computer store. However, you are not pleased with the service you received.Wrote a letter to store manager. In the letter:-describe the situation.- explain why you are dissatisfied.- say what you want manag 78
- For the past year you have been a member of a local club. Now you want to discontinue your membership. Write letter to the club Secretary.In your letter-State what type of membership you haveHave have you paidGive details of how you benefited from the cl 73
- For the past year you have been a member of a local club. Now you want to discontinue your membership. Write letter to the club Secretary.In your letter-State what type of membership you haveHave have you paidGive details of how you benefited from the cl 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... at home and workplace. The question is whether or not using robots in day to day life is a co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...o day life is a correct decision. In my personal opinion, it is true and shall reveal it further...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...ned, robots sure take on a lot of work. Their a multiple reasons but to name a few, r...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... Not only this but robots can multitask also. For instance - a CNC machine can do bo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, well, after all, as to, for instance, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38412698413 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17582335185 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631746031746 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5749764212 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6842105263 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136885124826 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385733661658 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713166119248 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810151276015 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530762643367 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 13.0946893788 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 12.4159519038 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.