In the modern era, shopping is more increase day by day in human beings lives. Therefore, it is witnessed small shopping shops in cities and town, whereas are closed and replaced in shopping big mall in existing time. I agree with this given notion and I will explain my views with the notion as well as how it will explain bad result on poverty than past.
Commencing with the most salient reason why the majority of elder individual faced more difficulties in life in today time. Although the trend of big mall shopping more advantageous, yet we can't ignore the awful effect of this trend. However, nowadays the more increase mall in cities, the more faced problem for ordinary people. Since there neither nor knowledge about climbing on the electronic street, nor they are read the price who available on the product. It is fact despite the majority of people prefer to shopping in the street market compare to a big mall. Ergo, becoming in life more impossible condition instead of they feel uneducated.
Another worth create bad impact for ordinary people in day to day lives. Nonetheless, modern-era shopping is more expensive than street market. Owing to this it more difficultly for common people. Since neither they have not more money, nor they can not purchase things in a big mall. In addition to, in mall the things price fix, due to they face difficulty for individual. For instance, it is observed in the market majority of vendors replace their shops in the big mall these days.
To sum up, due they faced more difficulties in ordinary people life than in past. In my perspective, our authorities ought to start control on expenditure in the market. The established big mall more difficulties for cities.
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 66
- Some people play sport when they are young but then stop doing physical exercise when they become adults Why is this What can be done to solve this problem 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Modern buildings change the character and appearance of towns and cities The government should insist that new buildings be built in traditional styles to protect cultural identity To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...mall shopping more advantageous, yet we cant ignore the awful effect of this trend. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shop'?
Suggestion: shop
...espite the majority of people prefer to shopping in the street market compare to a big m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...fficulties in ordinary people life than in past. In my perspective, our authorities oug...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86440677966 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56629647963 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515254237288 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6866204304 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7222222222 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205689862513 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747466972427 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103881703642 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139816175538 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838422875122 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.