Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive developments. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
These days, news journalist pay more attention to the difficulties and crises in society instead of upward growth and developments. It is argued by some individuals that this presentation can be harmful to people as well as to the community. While the repetition of mistakes can create panic and worry in the viewers about government policies, I am of the opinion that awareness of wrongdoing is more important to bring justice.
Reporting of hurdles and crises is useful to make people aware of bad things happening in society. Information about wrong activities in public by media reports keep the faulty individual on alert as well as others. In other words, exposing wrongdoing activities can benefit society in terms of vigilance. For instance, reports on rape cases in India is common these days by news agencies, it represents that the security needs to be more strengthen in terms of women safety in India. Therefore the week points in public can be addressed in such a way so that people become more attentive.
However, excess reporting of bad things can create panic situation and possibility of disbelief on law enforcement agency. Information of bad news all the time by media can represent bad psychological image against controlling authority for the viewer irrespective of some developments. For instance, more focus on bad activities by the government can create a bad image of a government in public irrespective of their development steps.
In conclusion, although, the trend of focus on problems by media can represent the wrong picture of society, I believe that the criticism of misconduct or problems is must so that impartiality can be eliminated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | JAGJITPARMAR | 56 | view |
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information ,such as their hobbies and interests ,and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vi 78
- A friend of yours is going on holiday soon and has asked you to recommend a destination.Write a letter to your friend and recommend a good place for a holiday that you have visited before. Say where you went, where you stayed, what you can do there and wh 89
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity. Do you think eating together is important to people in your country? 56
- You and some friends ate a meal at a restaurant to celebrate a special occasion, and you were very pleased with the food and service.Write a letter to the manager. In your letter•Give details of your visit to the restaurant•Explain the reason for the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...then in terms of women safety in India. Therefore the week points in public can be addres...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so that impartiality can be eliminated.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16483516484 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0379045298 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4042295588 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144506104504 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585806041504 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511747422497 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970170885545 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312331431422 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.