Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Modern technology has become an inherent part of people's life. This has altered the way of interaction humans are doing with each-other. In This essay I will elucidate that how communication is changed due to technology and overall this is a negative development.
Ostensibly, influence of latest inventions can be seen on people's lifestyle as more importance is given to virtual communication instead of physical conversation. Nowadays, people prefer to be in touch with each-other by using social media such as., Facebook and whats app, whereas in previous time, people used to sit together and share their daily happenings. Consequently, it is possible to make long distance relationship though it was not feasible without modern gizmo. To exemplify, one of my friends has girlfriend in the USA which is solely blessings of the internet. However, I deem that drawbacks cannot be neglected.
The primary reason to consider it as a negative evolution is that emotional attachments are alleviated due to mere physical meetings. Moreover, cyber crime is augmenting incessantly by scamming people on the cyber space because of inadequate standards of verification. For example, a survey from American express showed that more than 40% of people are scammed on Facebook by hackers by making fake profiles. In addition to this, people are less talking with their family members and always indulge in their smart phones due to which kinship is ruined. On the bright side, people can do video chat and share pictures from any corner of the world which is the biggest boon of technology.
To recapitulate, it can be reiterated that though communication becomes smoother and distance does not matter, I believe that deterrent implications on personal relations cannot be ignored. Therefore, I consider it as a negative occuring.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...e development. Ostensibly, influence of latest inventions can be seen on peoples lifes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...nce of latest inventions can be seen on peoples lifestyle as more importance is given t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ing social media such as., Facebook and whats app, whereas in previous time, people u...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28865979381 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00639957002 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7589097276 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304128845869 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863895148098 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691271341786 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171734276815 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104656609982 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.