Some people think the government should be responsible for solving the pollution problems which results from heavy traffic.To what extent do you agree?
it is argued that authority should be accountable for issues regarding contamination which are occurred due to traffic congestion. Owing to this, I partially uphold the notion because it is not only the duty of government, but as a citizen we should also put efforts in order to resolve crisis create because of pollution.
The primary reason to bolster this credence is that higher authority charges various types of taxes from its citizens. Therefore, in return it is the moral responsibility of the government that they should implement different solutions through which problems of contamination can be eliminated. For example, government can levy strict rules and regulations that must be obeyed by people, thus, it will assist to untangle issues of pollution. In addition to this, authority should encourage their people to use eco-friendly mode of transportation as well as public transport. So that, problems related to traffic jams can be alleviated. However, I deem that people can also play an effective role in this matter by taking initiative from themselves in order to solve issues of traffic congestion.
First and foremost, the main issue of traffic jam is that it is one of the pivotal factor of air pollution. By planting trees on streets and unusable land air can be purified. Secondly, people should adopt green ways such as., Cycling and electric vehicle that create least pollution. Moreover, instead of preferring cars to commute in city, people should give preference to buses and trains. Hence, this issue can be untangled by profound actions of people as well.
In conclusion, the solution of issues happened from pollution occurred due to heavy traffic should be taken care by the combine effort of authority as well as people because it cannot be solved individually by government and citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that authority should be acco...
^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'create the least'.
Suggestion: create the least
... as., Cycling and electric vehicle that create least pollution. Moreover, instead of preferr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19256756757 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86648785937 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4002174282 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.785714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26915224458 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927168824885 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664256642162 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175608902897 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638210995905 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.