Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development

It is true that technologies have had an influence on communication between people. It has made an impact on the connections they make with others, and in my opinion, it is an improvement over the past.
Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, the internet and electronic mail, as well as telephones, now allow businesspeople all over the world to interact without ever meeting each other in real life. Secondly, video calling facilities change the traditional relationship model between students and teachers. For instance, services such as Skype make it possible for a student to take a video lesson with a teacher in a different city or a country. Finally, many individuals use social networks, such as Facebook, to make new friends around the world who share common interests with them, and they interact with the use of computers rather than face-to-face.
Some people believe that the new technology deprives them of real human interactions, which are important in improving valuable skills such as discourse, debate and empathy. Despite this, the numerous benefits of modern communication technology make me believe that it is overall positive development. The ability to connect with another in an instant is one of the major benefits of mobile phones. This is proven at emergency situations where immediate assistance can be sought by dialling a phone number. In addition to that, businesses have not only improved but also expanded tremendously because of this. Connectivity between countries has made it feasible for companies to outsource their work to subject matter experts in different geographical locations and proceed work round the clock.
In conclusion, while there may be some negative impacts, technology has made the society connected and efficient as never before, which can be considered as a positive development.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35451505017 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02712353871 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8297396836 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217279185799 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652558669103 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357164937156 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112713177936 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333299503311 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.