Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
It is argued in recent times there has been rampant growth in waste generation. This essay will argue that this is because of the usage of plastic materials and items, and the possible solution is to levy an additional charge on products.
The primary reason for an increase in trash nowadays is because of the excessive use of plastic items. This is to say that people consume more plastic goods because they are light in weight, easy to use, and less expensive. The main source of plastic waste is polythene packets, pet bottles, and packaging materials. These items are non-biodegradable, which means they cannot be decomposed in the soil, thereby it adds up to the existing rubbish dump. For example, as per an article published by The Times Magazine, there 3.1 million tons of plastic consumed in the USA every year, and 67% of it makes it to landfill dump area in Florida.
A long term solution to this predicament is to increase the tax rate on items that are not biodegradable. In other words, this will make the price of goods more expensive because it will make the cost of manufacturing expensive and the producer will pass on this hike to the customer. Consumers will feel discouraged and will reduce consumption or stop using. Therefore the demand will fall, and it will lead to a decline in garbage waste. For example, as per an article published by The Times Magazine, the government of Ireland introduced a 10% plastic tax in the year 2016, and in the following year country's waste produce dramatically declined from 2.1 million tons to 1.4 million tons.
In conclusion, the chief reason for a surge in the trash is because of excessive usage of plastics and the most effective solution is to introduce a new tax on items that cannot be disposed of.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Some people feel that entertainers e g film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of jobs should be highly paid 67
- Some people feel that entertainers e g film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of job should be highly paid 67
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 73
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: light
...ume more plastic goods because they are light in weight, easy to use, and less expensive. The m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... will reduce consumption or stop using. Therefore the demand will fall, and it will lead ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76948051948 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68324660867 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516233766234 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3472700949 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0986784673735 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032723838264 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334985377972 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497211774104 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036572114969 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: light
...ume more plastic goods because they are light in weight, easy to use, and less expensive. The m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... will reduce consumption or stop using. Therefore the demand will fall, and it will lead ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76948051948 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68324660867 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516233766234 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3472700949 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0986784673735 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032723838264 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334985377972 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497211774104 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036572114969 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.