In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In many nations, some people feel that it is imperative to fund the construction of high speed railway lines connecting cities whereas the rest of the population opine that the money will be better spent on developing the existing public transport infrastructure. Both schools of thought have their pros and cons.
Firstly, let’s talk about why we need high speed trains connecting cities. Our economies have become more and more dependent on one another and it is important for both goods and people to travel quickly between major metros. The rapid growth of the airline industry has enabled us to play and work on a truly global scale. Airplanes are the most common mode of transport used to travel between cities as it is cheap, fast and very efficient. However, it has brought its own problems like tremendous amount of air pollution which causes health problems and most importantly global warming. This is where the high speed trains come into the picture. They run on electricity, which if generated from renewable sources like solar and hydropower solves the problem of air pollution. These days the locomotives have become very silent and thus they even put breaks on noise pollution. They will also be a lot cheaper to manufacture than planes. They will, however need to be fast enough so that people will prefer them to the aircraft. The French, Japanese and Chinese already have a huge network of high speed rail lines.
Unlike high speed trains, which connect cities, public transport enables citizens to travel within the city. The bustling metros of today have been engulfed by concrete structures and family cars. While personal vehicles have made traveling more comfortable, they have also caused a great deal of pollution. A lot of people have realized this and want to reduce the air pollution and leave behind cleaner cities for their future generations. If the government invests in public transports, more and more people will want to use it.
To conclude, I feel that building railway lines for high speed trains connecting cities and developing public transport will solve two different problems. The former will enable green and efficient travel between cities. On the other hand, the latter will allow people to commute to and from work without causing much of an impact on the environment. Therefore, I am of the opinion that both the ideas are equally important and should be funded accordingly to create a cleaner and sustainable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Vivi_peach | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | Behnaz.babayani | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | mina_sharifi | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | aaaudrey43 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | S.Ranaut | 78 | view |
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 56
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to get news However others believe that they can get news better through another media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the 61
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one langua 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...picture. They run on electricity, which if generated from renewable sources like s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04146341463 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52831790597 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4645670771 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9545454545 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201790763871 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053327923003 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625807951452 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146961436718 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712211516691 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.