In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some proponents indicate that governments should focus on developing railway lines for high-speed trains, others argue the opposite. This essay will shed light on both views before concluding that fast trains should be the focus in the future.
On the one hand, governments could save money by enhancing public transport that are already existed. This is because buses and traditional trains require fewer complex details when problems occur and need repairment. As those details are uncomplicated to produce, they could be fond easily on the market at low prices. Fixing or repairing existing public transport would cost less resources.
On the other hand, building more cutting-edge trains would save travelers a significant amount of time and money. Subway, for instance, runs at extremely high speed compared to old trains, which would take less time to bring its passengers to their destinations. Furthermore, those trains are often capable of caring a lot more number of persons than other types of public transport, which then mitigate the fee that each passenger has to pay. This method, therefore, is preferred among developed nations owing to its conveniency. European countries have developed many subway lines running through different nations in the area, for example. If people choose to travel mostly by such method, other public transport will soon be replaced, mitigating the amount of carbon dioxide emissions released into the atmosphere.
In conclusion, improving current public transport would cost government bodies less, however, I believe that local and national authorities should invest in constructing subways and other types of high-speed trains as travelling would become less time-consuming and more affordable for the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Vivi_peach | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | Behnaz.babayani | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | mina_sharifi | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | aaaudrey43 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | S.Ranaut | 78 | view |
- Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 61
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 67
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun subway seems to be countable; consider using: 'many subways'.
Suggestion: many subways
...ency. European countries have developed many subway lines running through different nations...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54074074074 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74294205891 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0282050695 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.076923077 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256353160644 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832869216461 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489948535821 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153212550669 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245167694848 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun subway seems to be countable; consider using: 'many subways'.
Suggestion: many subways
...ency. European countries have developed many subway lines running through different nations...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54074074074 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74294205891 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0282050695 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.076923077 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256353160644 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832869216461 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489948535821 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153212550669 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245167694848 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.