The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.To what extent do you agree or disagre

Essay topics:

The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

It is believed that to prepare young people, about the methods of living, thinking and behaving, traditional methods are beneficial. Although older people have an advantage for their thinking. I believe there is a need for a different perspective on the way of living.

At the outset, older living standards were built to live a happy life. It is because our forefathers believe in a work-life balance culture. The stress in those times was given on equal time and energy for both the family and professions. Whereas, these days it is just upside down as increasing the tension in relations is a good example of it. Further, owing to joint family culture, children can learn social and moral values from the senior family members. Therefore, they tend to love, respect and empathise with their kith and kins.

On the other hand, due to the globalisation, upcoming generations must live with modern standards. Firstly, nowadays, there is a trend of women at the workplace to assist male members to meet the ends. Nonetheless, this approach has never been thought about by older generations. Secondly, it is pretty common to talk with strangers, both at institutes and workplaces. Because to acquire better job opportunities, it is imperative to go beyond the comfort zone to make new relations. Otherwise, children with the older mindsets could lag due to dearth of this trait. Lastly, racism has been reduced to a great extent due to modern values, which is good to improve relations and integrity at the world level.

In conclusion, this essay compared two disparate approaches to be used in teaching methods. While older traditional methods were useful for the previous generation, from my viewpoint children had better learn new methods to live, think and behave to keep pace with modern humanity.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-13 D_g_b 78 view
2019-11-01 Angrej Singh 78 view
2019-11-01 subarshan 22 view
2019-08-07 VivianL 73 view
2019-07-03 samlekhi 78 view
Essays by user D_g_b :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gy for both the family and professions. Whereas, these days it is just upside down as i...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were useful for the previous generation, from my viewpoint children had better le...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09395973154 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75002405696 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627516778523 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6620870171 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185966947339 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509728311103 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048152319839 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109611929624 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492526147135 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.