One long-distance flight consumes fuel which a car consumes in several years, but they cause the same amount of pollution. Some people think we should discourage nonessential flights, such as tourist travel, rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable that long-distance flights consume more fuel than cars do in several years, however, they discharge the same amount of pollution. While some people think that we should discontinue air travel to reduce the amount of pollution rather than limit the use of cars, I strongly disagree that it is the ideal solution.
Undoubtedly, flights consume a huge amount of fuel when compared to cars, but nowadays, we have an enormous number of cars on the roads. Over the last half-century, cars have gradually become more affordable that people can easily save up to acquire one. Therefore, on average, we have way more cars than non-essential flights causing almost the same amount of pollution. At the same time, the discontinuation of tour travels will negatively impact the tourism sector which is a major contributor to the global economy. A recent study published in Nigeria states that the tourism sector accounts for more than 30% of the Nigerian economy, hence, discontinuing non-essential flights will only create new problems.
Furthermore, there is evidence that waste gas from cars and non-essential flights are not the leading cause of environmental pollution. The main culprits are the industrial wastes from rapidly growing factories. Therefore, discouraging non-essential flights or limiting the use of cars will not suddenly give us blue skies and fresh air. We could tackle these environmental problems by developing strict controls around the discharge of waste and the use of environmentally friendly resources in production processes.
To sum up, it can be seen that the cons of discontinuing non-essential flights outweigh the pros, hence I am strongly against the idea. Scientists and the government can search for cleaner energy sources like nuclear and solar energy to replace fuel and prevent the situation from deteriorating further through mobility innovations and renewable energy solutions.
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money Do you agree or disagree 84
- Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment but population and education as well What problems will your country face in the next ten years How can these problems be overcome Give reasons for your 84
- There have been some problems with the bus service especially its reliability in your area over the last two weeks Write a letter to the manager of the bus company In your letter describe what the problems are explain how these problems are affecting you 89
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we don t need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44186046512 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05864793723 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594684385382 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7674290656 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374819783233 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127788175371 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11208201098 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229277260871 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171910234187 0.056905535591 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.