The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is considered by some that restrictions on people movements are much required nowadays for lowering the traffic problems in metropolis. However, while I agree that other alternatives can also be considered by the government, I firmly believe that unnecessary travels to shopping malls and other places are the pivotal reasons for increasing traffic in city centres. Such unneeded travels can be avoided by people using digital media platforms for shopping, work and, education.
To begin, with regards to advancement in the technology, online platform is increasingly in the demand. In recent ages, pupils are lacking time which probably reduces the need of commuting from one place to others and also helps in creating an opportunity of using online applications such as amazon, Microsoft Teams and, Zoom for online shopping, work from home, and distance learning respectively. Moreover, it not only helps in lowering the traffic issues but also saves time of mass people while travelling to work places, schools, and grocery stores. Additionally, it provides comfort to the community at the ease of doing all short of works from their homes. For example, in recent pandemic of COVID-19, majority of organisations have started their operations online, and therefore, it leads to a new style of operating the business where everyone is staying safe at home and maintaining social distancing while working for each others.
On the other hand, certainly,government is needed to play an important role in addressing traffic congestions in urban areas by introducing some awareness programme regarding the negative consequences of traffic jams on individual people and Society. Furthermore, strengthening the network of public transports namely the Metro and rails are the best way to cope not only with steeping traffic problems, but also environmental pollutions particularly air and noise pollution. Lastly, other initiatives can also be taken by authorities to further stricter the rule of using personal vehicles. For instance, every year in Delhi during the time of Diwali festival, Government of Delhi passes an "Odd-even" law, and this rule has tremendously helped in reducing traffic jams and air pollution problems in Delhi.
To conclude, although government contributions can not alone address the increasing traffic problems in city centre, individual persons participation are much required to overcome such problems. Indeed, unneeded movements to the shopping malls, works, and education can be replaced by public using online tools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | soji_kab@hotmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | Ronald88 | 80 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | Padma Jha | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | Alina18092000 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause and how can we solve these problems 67
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on local works rather than showing the cultures or artworks from other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 84
- Many people join distance learning programmes study material post TV Internet and study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does Do you agree or disagree 89
- Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences To what extent do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , government
... others. On the other hand, certainly,government is needed to play an important role in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...fic problems in city centre, individual persons participation are much required to over...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, lastly, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56265984655 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11721167934 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57800511509 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8176206169 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.357142857 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9285714286 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261882049238 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794162235903 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434174684717 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143179114394 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052286656777 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.