In the past, people like to store knowledge in books. At present, we like to store on the internet. Do you think advantages out-weight the disadvantages?
In the past, people preferred to store their experience in books. Whereas, today almost everyone likes to share information on the internet. Personally, I support the current way of storing and sharing information and moreover, this positive trend looks set to continue.
The method of storing knowledge in books came into existence when our ancestors realized the need of sharing knowledge with others, and over the period of time, it becomes one of the famous media of sharing information among people. However, publishing a book is the tedious process as it has to go through multiple manual stages such as putting thoughts together, proofreading, correcting mistakes if any and so on. And eventually, distributing a copy of a book to end users. It means each stage needs an extensive human intervention. Add to it, even if a hard copy of a book on a specific topic is handy, it is difficult for a person to search for a topic or sentence of the interest in it.
On contradictory to it, people find it easy to upload and publish an article or information on the web-based world as this process is well structured and guided through easily understandable steps. Such method helps in making a writer's life blissful. As more and more people are getting acquainted with multiple features available on a computer such as copy, cut, paste, and spell check, writing a book has become a pleasure. Even though the internet is the sea of vast information, it is extremely easy to locate news or information of interest with a few clicks. It means, storing knowledge on the internet involves a semi-automatic process.
As every garden has weeds, there would be some disadvantages of storing knowledge on the internet as it is globally easily accessible media for posting and reading any kind of information. Due to ease, people publish their experience on plenty of websites now and then. There is no controlling authority who can check for the authenticity of uploaded information and such post could be misleading or misguide to people reading it. However, with creating more awareness among readers such kind of negative impact can be easily ruled out.
In the light of the above discussion, I agree to the fact that the advantages of storing knowledge on the internet definitely out-weight the disadvantages in terms of ease in writing, sharing, and searching information.
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by articially intelligent robots. What is your opinion. 89
- Some universities offer online courses for students. Do you think this is a positive or negative development for students? 84
- School are spending more time teaching subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job. To what extend do you agree and disagree. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...red to store their experience in books. Whereas, today almost everyone likes to share i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing knowledge with others, and over the period of time, it becomes one of the famous media of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...le steps. Such method helps in making a writers life blissful. As more and more people ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, as to, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01262626263 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95620151291 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7179121723 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.277777778 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218578394717 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688914001528 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812527314636 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139694682619 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778736852968 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.